Library & Resources
- Annual Reports
- Strategic Plans
- Annual Operating Plans
- Fit for the Intended Journey Guide
- Pork Industry Snapshot
- Economic Analysis of African swine fever incursion into Australia
- Industry Survey Results
- Submissions to Government
- Biosecurity Update
- Pigs to Pork Newsletter
- Guidelines for Fostering
- Pigs N’ Mud Newsletter
- Best practice gilt management for fertility and longevity
- Fact Sheets
- Three Year Performance Reviews
- Media releases
- Education Toolkit
- Support for producers
- Research Reports
- Next on the Menu
- APL news and updates
- Industry news
Industry Survey Results
2019/20 snapshot of results
75% of respondents were members of APL. 72% of total respondents were satisfied with the membership services APL provided. The reasons that producers do not become members remain unclear from the data but could include that the producers are unaware of or uninterested in the benefit of membership.
83% of respondents were satisfied with the frequency of APL communications. 10% preferred more and 4% wanted less. 3% did not receive any communications from APL.
Effectiveness of Levy Use
64% of respondents reported that they thought APL was using producer levies effectively and 77% reported they thought APL was doing a good job overall. 57% of respondents thought APL provided a direct or indirect benefit to their business. This represented 85% of industry when weighted against sow numbers.
Most respondents stated that marketing was the most crucial area that they thought levies should be focussed on.
Housing and Husbandry
91% of production had completely gestation stall free (GSF) systems. 34% of respondents representing 84% of production had phased out the use of gestation stalls in their systems at the time of the survey.
97% of production was using conventional farrowing crates and 85% of respondents were not planning on changing the way their farrowing system was run.
Antimicrobial Stewardship (AMS) plans were adopted by 21% of respondents (65% of production), and 9% of respondents were not aware of what an AMS plan was.
58% of organisations employed staff, representing 97% of production. 27% of organisations reported having a staffing shortage.
62% of organisations believe that there are not enough staff training opportunities in the industry.
An environmental management plan had been adopted by 77% of respondents (98% of production). Respondents accounting for 81% of production considered themselves to be very water secure.
Waste Bedding Materials
74% of respondents (55% of production) used waste bedding and manure for on-farm fertiliser. 29% of respondents stored and composted it on-farm and 10% sold it to other farms.
57% of respondents (83% of production) said that they tested their soil, 67% of which tested their soil once per year.
Effluent and Energy
The data on effluent collection showed producers mainly used an underfloor collection system. However, when weighed against the production, the most common effluent collection method was a combination of deep litter and under floor collection systems (57% of production).
6% of respondents (6 organisations) used biogas to produce energy (39% of production).
Capacity and Infrastructure Planning
32% of respondents planned to build new infrastructure in 2020.
2018/19 Snapshot of results
Click on the link below to access a snapshot of the 2018-19 Industry Survey. The full report is available to producers who responded to the survey.